Abstract — Abortion Rhetoric: The Silence of Experience
In Abortion Rhetoric: The Silence of Experience (ed. 2009), investigative journalist Diane Walsh examines how the lived realities of abortion in British Columbia Canada are still systematically excluded from public discourse some 20 years, later. Through a mix of archival media analysis, political context, and first-hand testimony, Walsh reveals how legislative debate and mainstream news in 2000s relied on polarized slogans and symbolic imagery—while omitting the voices of those most directly affected. This erasure, she argues, sustains stigma, flattens complexity, and keeps abortion framed as an abstract moral battleground rather than a lived experience shaped by relationships, economics, and health. By reintroducing personal narratives into the conversation, Walsh challenges the cultural and political gatekeeping that silences experience. Her work resonates today, as reproductive rights debates across North America and beyond continue to grapple with polarization, misinformation, and the enduring absence of nuanced, first-person perspectives.
Chapter 1 — The Silence in the Public Sphere
Focus: Examines how women’s lived abortion experiences were largely missing from the media and political debate. Key Evidence: Analysis of 1990s Vancouver Island newspaper archives and public hearings shows most quotes came from politicians, activists, or religious figures—not patients. Rhetorical Insight: Silence functions as a form of social control; by omitting experience, discourse remains abstract and polarized.
Chapter 2 — The Polarized Frame
Focus: Investigates how abortion discourse in Canada’s post-Morgentaler era hardened into a binary (‘pro-choice’ vs. ‘pro-life’). Key Evidence: Media soundbites rely on emotionally charged slogans and imagery—either “my body, my choice” or fetal personhood imagery. Rhetorical Insight: Polarization flattens nuance and removes space for stories of uncertainty, mixed feelings, or complex circumstances.
Chapter 3 — Media Gatekeeping
Focus: Looks at editorial practices and news framing. Key Evidence: Journalistic “balance” often meant giving equal space to ideological camps rather than elevating first-hand testimony. Rhetorical Insight: “Balance” can be a false equivalence when it sidelines lived experience.
Chapter 4 — The Political Landscape in Canada
Focus: Situates discourse in the political and social climate of 1990s British Columbia. Key Evidence: Politicians avoided abortion discussions to dodge controversy, while clinics faced organized protests. Rhetorical Insight: Political avoidance further entrenches silence, creating a vacuum filled by activist extremes.
Chapter 5 — Breaking the Silence
Focus: Introduces personal anecdotes and interviews with women who underwent abortions. Key Evidence: Stories show abortion as intertwined with economic hardship, relationships, reproductive health, and identity. Rhetorical Insight: Personal testimony challenges stigma and rehumanizes the debate.
—
Read Book play.google.com/store/books/details/Abortion_Rhetoric_The_Silence_of_Experience
An INDY JOURNALIST’S BLOG 